Guide

How to catalog a wine collection (without losing a weekend)

Most cataloguing advice tells you to be thorough. That is why most cellars are half catalogued: thoroughness is what makes you stop on bottle forty. This is the order I use instead, which gets the record useful long before it gets complete.

By AveryWSET Level 3 in Wines, working through the Diploma. Updated 27 August 2026.

The CellarPals bottlings list showing six wines, each with producer, vintage, grape, region and how many bottles are on hand
Six labels, seven bottles on hand. Producer, vintage, grape, count — the four fields that do the work, with the rest left blank on purpose.

Why the first attempt usually dies

The failure is always the same, and it is not laziness. You start with good intentions and a spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet asks you for everything: producer, vintage, appellation, blend, alcohol, size, purchase date, purchase price, merchant, drink-from, drink-to, notes. Thirteen columns, and every one of them wants filling before the row looks finished.

At bottle ten that is fine. At bottle forty you are looking up an appellation for a wine you know perfectly well, because the column is empty and empty columns nag. At bottle sixty you stop, and the spreadsheet is now worse than nothing: it describes a cellar you no longer have, and you cannot trust it enough to use it, so you go back to opening the cellar door and looking.

The mistake is treating the catalogue as a document to be completed rather than a tool to be used. A record of sixty bottles with four fields each is genuinely useful. A record of sixty bottles with thirteen fields each, in a cellar of two hundred, is a monument to an abandoned Saturday.

The four fields that do the work

Almost everything you actually ask a cellar comes down to four things. Get these and stop; the rest can arrive later, or never.

  • What it is. Producer and vintage. Not the appellation, not the blend — those are lookups, and a good catalogue can fetch them for you afterwards.
  • How many. The single most useful number in a cellar, and the one a shelf cannot tell you when the case is three deep.
  • Where it is. Specific enough to walk to. This is the field people skip and then regret, and I have written a whole feature around getting it right.
  • When to drink it. Even roughly. A window of “2026 to 2031” is worth ten times an exact appellation, because it is the thing that changes what you do tonight.

Everything else — price, merchant, alcohol, tasting notes — is real information that becomes useful later. None of it is worth stalling the catalogue for. Add it to a bottle the day you have a reason to, which in practice means the day you drink it or the day you insure it.

Do it in physical order, not alphabetical

Start at one end of the rack and work along it. Not by producer, not by region, not by the order they appear in your delivery emails.

Physical order matters for a reason that only shows up an hour in: it is the only order where you can tell whether you have finished. Work alphabetically and you have no idea which bottles you have already done, so you check, and checking is what turns two hours into five. Work along the shelf and the boundary is visible — everything to the left is done.

It also means the location field fills itself. You are standing in front of shelf three, so every bottle you enter for the next ten minutes is on shelf three. That is the field people skip when they catalogue from a spreadsheet at the kitchen table, and it is the one that makes the catalogue worth having.

Photograph the label, do not type it

Typing a producer, a vintage, a region and a blend takes something like ninety seconds a bottle if you know the wine and rather longer if you do not. Two hundred bottles is five hours of typing, which is the weekend this guide is named after.

Photographing a label takes about three seconds. The reading is not perfect — a creased label, an unusual cuvée or a small producer will produce a miss — but correcting a filled form is a different activity from filling an empty one. You are checking rather than composing, and checking is fast.

This is the single biggest lever on whether a catalogue gets finished, which is why label scanning exists at all. If your tool does not have it, the practical alternative is to photograph every label first, in one pass along the shelf, and type them up afterwards from the photographs. It is still faster, because the two activities interfere with each other: standing in a cold cellar is not where you want to be doing data entry.

Cases are one photograph, not twelve

A case of the same wine is one entry with a count of twelve, not twelve entries. That sounds obvious and it is where a lot of catalogues quietly go wrong, because the moment you drink one you have to decide what the record means.

The distinction worth getting right is between a bottling — the wine, the vintage, the producer — and a bottle, which is a physical object in a physical slot with its own purchase price and its own fate. Twelve bottles of one bottling is the normal case. Each can sit in a different rack, be worth a different amount because you bought them two years apart, and be drunk at different times.

Get that right at the start and “how many do I have left” answers itself forever. Get it wrong and you end up with twelve near-identical rows that drift apart, or one row with a number you edit by hand and forget to.

Give every bottle a window, even a bad one

A drinking window is the field that turns an inventory into something you use. Without it a catalogue answers “what do I own”, which you half know already. With it the catalogue answers “what should I open tonight”, which is the question that makes you open the app at all.

People skip it because they feel unqualified to judge. Do not — an approximate window from the producer, the merchant, or a decent estimate is enormously more useful than a blank, and you can override it the moment you know better. The failure mode this prevents is expensive and silent: a bottle you bought to age, found eight years later past its best, behind something else.

The one thing not to do is invent a confident window you do not believe. A wrong window is worse than none, because it invites you to open something early on false authority. Leave it blank rather than guess, and let the bottle stay out of the ready-to-drink list until you know. Drinking windows covers where the numbers come from and how to override them.

Do the spirits at the same time

If part of your shelf is whisky, rum or agave, catalogue it in the same pass. The temptation is to leave it for later because most wine tools cannot hold it, and later never arrives — you end up with a catalogued wine cellar and a note on your phone for everything else.

Spirits do not fit wine’s shape, which is the real reason so many tools skip them. A vintage is usually meaningless; the useful numbers are an age statement and an ABV, and what matters is which bottling this is rather than which harvest. They also do not age in the bottle, so a drinking window is the wrong idea entirely — a sealed bourbon is not waiting for anything.

Either give them their own fields or accept the note on the phone. Spirits tracking is how I handle it; the point of this section is only that doing it in a second pass means not doing it.

Keeping it true is a smaller job than starting it

A catalogue goes stale in exactly one way: bottles leave and nobody says so. Additions are easy — a delivery is a memorable event and you are already holding the bottles. Consumption is invisible, and one uncounted Tuesday is all it takes to make the number a guess.

So the habit that matters is marking a bottle drunk at the moment you open it, not at the end of the week. Whatever tool you use, the pour should be one action. If it takes more than a few seconds you will not do it on a Friday evening with guests in the room, and that is the evening it matters.

The other half is what happens when you do. That is the moment you actually have an opinion about the wine, and it is the cheapest time to record one — which is why the pour and the tasting note belong together rather than in separate visits.

Know what you are not doing

A finished catalogue is not one where every field is full. It is one where you trust the count, you can find any bottle, and you know what is ready. That is four fields and a habit.

Everything else is optional depth you add when a reason appears: a valuation for insurance, tasting notes for the wines you care about, purchase history when you start noticing what you overpay for. Depth added for a reason gets used. Depth added because a column was empty gets abandoned along with the rest of it.

The tool this is written from

Everything above is how CellarPals works, because it is the cellar I keep. Fourteen days free, then $12.99 a month or $119.99 a year.

If you are moving from somewhere else, the CellarTracker comparison is honest about what carries over and what does not.

Read next

How to organize a wine cellarRacks, bins, and a map you'll actually keep updated.

All guides